Audiences
Jardis for different roles and teams
Same Architecture Problem, Different Costs Depending on Who You Are
A CTO sees declining delivery speed as a planning problem. A software architect sees it as structural failure in module boundaries. A developer sees it as daily debugging in code they did not write. A startup founder sees it as burned budget without visible progress. The perspectives differ — the underlying cause is the same: no architectural foundation that scales with the product.
Agencies building PHP projects for clients face a different pressure: handoffs to internal teams must work cleanly, and a codebase only the original developer understands is not a deliverable. Freelancers who need to spin up a production-ready stack quickly lose time on boilerplate instead of business logic. Dev teams in growing companies fail at onboarding because no consistent architecture exists for new developers to orient around.
Each role has different priorities, but every one of them benefits from a codebase where domain boundaries are structurally enforced rather than documented in a wiki nobody reads. The pages below describe what DDD-based code generation concretely changes for each audience.